Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Moving on In Iraq

I'd like to first admit that this idea is not mine, but I completely agree with it.

A few weeks ago, after the midterm elections were over, I was discussing the war in Iraq with someone, when they brought up their idea for how the war should be handled. They said that the best thing that the U.S. should do now, with the Democrats in control of the House and Senate, is to go up to the UN and ask for help. Bush should get up in front of the U.N. and openly admit that the motives for going to war in Iraq were totally false, and that we screwed up on this one, and ask for other nations to help. The person that I was talking with said that even when he proposed this to die hard conservatives, they couldn't find anything wrong with it.

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad released a letter to the American people today urging the U.S. to get out of Iraq and use the funds for the war to fund the poor and needy in our country. He has a point. As a strong advocate of the space program, I frequently receive flak about how the space program uses so much money and that it could be spent on helping the poor and improving life on Earth.

The space program has a $16 billion a year budget. With that they send probes to Mars, launch satellites that we rely on for communication, launch space shuttle missions, and build the International Space Station. The space station, has, and will continue to provide advances in technology that will improve life on Earth.

The war in Iraq has cost the U.S. about $346.3 billion dollars since 2003. See this link for the running total. The war has successfully implanted a democracy in Iraq and overthrown Saddam Hussein. The unfortunate side effects are, that where Iraq was once a secure country, with the only hint of terrorism being Saddam Hussein's regime, there is now a power vacuum where terrorism has been increasing since the war started and in fact created a new front on terror that didn't exist under Saddam. The truth is that most of the problems that our troops face are the direct results of poor planning by our government.

The only way to solve the issues that we face in Iraq is to go before the UN and admit that we made mistakes when we invaded and now, for the sake of global safety, we need help. Just because we're the strongest nation on Earth doesn't mean we can't admit when something has gone wrong and ask for help. That's a lesson that I've learned, but apparently it's something that Bush has failed to learn himself.

1 Comments:

At 3:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The humane thing to do in Iraq is to ask the Iraqi citizens what they would like done. Of those polled, 80% preferred a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawal. 5% would keep the present situation. It seems to be an unpopular situation to be invaded and destroyed by "liberators" and be colonized.
Back after WWI, England and France divided up the middle east among themselves, the U.S. was indifferent then."The British
suffered 450 dead in the Iraqi insurgency and more than 1500 wounded.In that summer of 1920, T.E. Lawrence-Lawrence of Arabia-estimated that the British had killed"about 10,000 Arabs in this rising. We cannot hope to maintaintain such an average..." Feisal, third son of the Sherif Hussain of Mecca,was proclaimed constitutional monarch by a "Council of Ministers" in Baghdad on July 22,1922 and a referendum gave him a laughably impossible 96% of the vote, a statistic that would become wearingly familiar in the Arab world over the next eighty years. He was neither an Iraqi nor a member of the Shias of Iraq. It was the the first betrayal of the Shias of Iraq. There would be two more within the next 1oo years."-Pages 145-148,"The Great War For Civilisation-the conquest of the middle east" by Robert Fisk, 2005.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home